ACT English & Reading · Conclusions and paragraph endings

Which choice most effectively completes the paragraph by explaining the significance of this personal experiment?

Teaching a Language to Speak Again
For roughly two thousand years, Hebrew survived without anyone actually speaking it as a first language. It remained very much alive in prayer, in religious study, and in scholarly writing, but the everyday task of raising a child, ordering food, or arguing about politics had, for centuries, fallen to whatever local language a Jewish community happened to speak wherever it lived. [1] Eliezer Ben-Yehuda arrived in Palestine in 1881 believing this arrangement did not have to be permanent.

His specific goal was narrower and more ambitious than simply promoting interest in Hebrew. [2] Ben-Yehuda wanted Hebrew restored as a genuine, everyday spoken language, used for the same ordinary purposes any living language serves its speakers. [3] The scale of the problem this goal created becomes clear once a single obvious fact is stated directly: [4] a language built almost entirely around ancient religious and literary vocabulary has no existing word for a great many things a modern household actually needs to discuss.

Ben-Yehuda's response to this gap was direct. [5] He simply began inventing words, coining Hebrew terms for concepts the ancient language had never needed to name, and he kept doing this for the rest of his working life. [6] By the end of his life, he had helped standardize and popularize a large modern Hebrew vocabulary, drawing both on older Hebrew sources and on newly coined terms.

Perhaps the most striking part of his strategy involved his own family. [7] When his first son was born in 1882, Ben-Yehuda made a specific, demanding request of his wife: raise the child hearing only Hebrew, from every visitor and family member, for every ordinary need a small child has. [8] If a language that had produced no native speakers for roughly two thousand years could produce even one again, inside a single household, the larger project suddenly looked considerably less impossible.

The broader effort succeeded on a scale far beyond one household. [9] By 1922, barely four decades after Ben-Yehuda's arrival, Hebrew had gained official recognition as a language of British Mandate Palestine, spoken not just by his own children but by a growing community of settlers who had adopted it as their common language. Linguists studying language revitalization efforts around the world still point to this case as the clearest example of a language moving from purely ceremonial use back into full, ordinary daily life. [10]
Which choice most effectively completes the paragraph by explaining the significance of this personal experiment?

Answer and explanation

Answer: C: If a language that had produced no native speakers for roughly two thousand years could produce even one again, inside a single household, the larger project suddenly looked considerably less…

This sentence directly explains the specific symbolic and practical significance of the household experiment: a single native speaker as proof of concept for the much larger revival project. Choice D introduces an unsupported claim about widespread early imitation the passage does not describe. B introduces an unsupported claim about family tension the passage never mentions. A, in this context, lacks this precise explanation of significance.

More Conclusions and paragraph endings questions

All Conclusions and paragraph endings questions

Learn the method behind questions like this one

The ACT English & Reading course teaches each tested skill through lessons, step-by-step solutions to sample problems, the complete study guide and full-length practice tests.