ACT English & Reading · Subject-verb agreement
Which choice most effectively completes the sentence, maintaining subject-verb agreement with the sentence's true subject?
A Different Kind of Battery
For more than a decade, lithium has dominated battery chemistry so thoroughly that most people simply assumed no serious alternative existed. That assumption is now being tested directly. A different element, sodium, has moved from research curiosity to commercial product with a speed that few engineers in the field predicted even five years ago. [1]
The appeal of sodium starts with simple chemistry. Sodium is roughly a thousand times more abundant in the earth's crust than lithium is, and unlike lithium, it can be extracted from ordinary seawater and common salt deposits rather than from a small number of geographically concentrated mines. Each of the major sodium-ion chemistries currently in development reflects [2] a distinct set of tradeoffs between cost, safety, and how much energy the resulting cell can actually store.
Cost and safety are where sodium's advantage currently shows up most clearly. Sodium-ion cells tend to be cheaper to produce, more stable at high temperatures, and considerably more tolerant of the deep cold that degrades many lithium-ion batteries. What sodium has not yet matched is energy density: a sodium-ion cell generally stores less energy for a given weight than a top lithium-ion cell does, which is precisely why grid-scale storage, where weight matters far less than it does in a moving vehicle, became the technology's first serious commercial market. [3]
That changed, at least partially, in February of 2026. CATL and Changan Automobile jointly released a mass-produced passenger vehicle powered by a sodium-ion battery, a genuine milestone for a technology that most automakers had previously treated as a distant, grid-only prospect. [4] Engineers who had spent years refining the underlying chemistry for stationary storage suddenly found their work adapted for a moving vehicle. It has surprised several industry analysts. [5]
The battery's performance in that first vehicle illustrates both sides of sodium's tradeoff clearly. Its energy density remains below that of a comparable lithium-ion pack, meaning the vehicle's range is somewhat more limited, [6] but its tolerance for extreme temperatures and its comparatively low manufacturing cost makes [7] it genuinely competitive for cost-sensitive, entry-level vehicles rather than for long-range flagship models.
Skeptics of the technology point out, correctly, that sodium-ion batteries represented less than one percent of global battery production as recently as 2025. Between the current pace of investment and the technology's genuine engineering advantages, however, few analysts now dismiss sodium-ion the way many did only a few years earlier. [8] Whether it ever truly rivals lithium in vehicles built for maximum range, or whether it settles permanently into a specific niche of grid storage and affordable transportation, sodium's [9] rapid rise from laboratory curiosity to commercial product is already a completed fact, not a speculative prediction. Manufacturers on multiple continents are scaling production lines. [10]
The appeal of sodium starts with simple chemistry. Sodium is roughly a thousand times more abundant in the earth's crust than lithium is, and unlike lithium, it can be extracted from ordinary seawater and common salt deposits rather than from a small number of geographically concentrated mines. Each of the major sodium-ion chemistries currently in development reflects [2] a distinct set of tradeoffs between cost, safety, and how much energy the resulting cell can actually store.
Cost and safety are where sodium's advantage currently shows up most clearly. Sodium-ion cells tend to be cheaper to produce, more stable at high temperatures, and considerably more tolerant of the deep cold that degrades many lithium-ion batteries. What sodium has not yet matched is energy density: a sodium-ion cell generally stores less energy for a given weight than a top lithium-ion cell does, which is precisely why grid-scale storage, where weight matters far less than it does in a moving vehicle, became the technology's first serious commercial market. [3]
That changed, at least partially, in February of 2026. CATL and Changan Automobile jointly released a mass-produced passenger vehicle powered by a sodium-ion battery, a genuine milestone for a technology that most automakers had previously treated as a distant, grid-only prospect. [4] Engineers who had spent years refining the underlying chemistry for stationary storage suddenly found their work adapted for a moving vehicle. It has surprised several industry analysts. [5]
The battery's performance in that first vehicle illustrates both sides of sodium's tradeoff clearly. Its energy density remains below that of a comparable lithium-ion pack, meaning the vehicle's range is somewhat more limited, [6] but its tolerance for extreme temperatures and its comparatively low manufacturing cost makes [7] it genuinely competitive for cost-sensitive, entry-level vehicles rather than for long-range flagship models.
Skeptics of the technology point out, correctly, that sodium-ion batteries represented less than one percent of global battery production as recently as 2025. Between the current pace of investment and the technology's genuine engineering advantages, however, few analysts now dismiss sodium-ion the way many did only a few years earlier. [8] Whether it ever truly rivals lithium in vehicles built for maximum range, or whether it settles permanently into a specific niche of grid storage and affordable transportation, sodium's [9] rapid rise from laboratory curiosity to commercial product is already a completed fact, not a speculative prediction. Manufacturers on multiple continents are scaling production lines. [10]
Which choice most effectively completes the sentence, maintaining subject-verb agreement with the sentence's true subject?
Answer and explanation
Answer: B: make
The true compound subject of this clause is "tolerance...and...cost," a plural compound subject requiring the plural verb "make," regardless of the singular nouns "tolerance" and "cost" considered individually. Choice A incorrectly uses the singular "makes," agreeing with only the nearer singular noun "cost" rather than the full compound subject. C incorrectly uses a participle, which cannot serve as the sentence's main verb here. D introduces an unnecessarily complex perfect construction not needed to express the sentence's straightforward present-tense claim.
More Subject-verb agreement questions
- Question 10Which choice most effectively completes the sentence, maintaining agreement with its subject?
- Question 11Which choice most effectively completes the sentence, maintaining subject-verb agreement with the…
- Question 26Which choice makes the sentence most grammatically acceptable?
Learn the method behind questions like this one
The ACT English & Reading course teaches each tested skill through lessons, step-by-step solutions to sample problems, the complete study guide and full-length practice tests.