SAT Reading & Writing · Inferences

The pattern of results most strongly suggests that traffic noise interferes with owl hunting success by ______

In controlled experiments, playing recorded traffic noise near owl hunting grounds reduced the owls' hunting success, with the strongest effects observed for owls that rely primarily on sound to locate prey instead of sight. Which choice most logically completes the text?

The pattern of results most strongly suggests that traffic noise interferes with owl hunting success by ______

Answer and explanation

Answer: D: masking the auditory cues that acoustically oriented hunters depend on to locate prey, instead of affecting hunting through some other sense.

The detail that does the most work in the passage is that the effect was strongest specifically for owls that hunt by sound. That selective pattern points to interference with the sense actually being used, which is what D states. A proposes a completely different mechanism (avoidance) the passage never measures. C describes an effect on prey, not on the owls' hunting ability, and the passage's finding is about hunting success, not prey visibility. B proposes permanent physical damage, a much stronger and unsupported claim compared to a temporary masking effect during the experiment.

More Inferences questions

All Inferences questions

Learn the method behind questions like this one

The SAT Reading & Writing course teaches each tested skill through lessons, step-by-step solutions to sample problems, the complete study guide and full-length practice tests.