SAT Reading & Writing · Command of Evidence (quantitative)

A biologist argues that the restored wetland showed a larger increase in recorded species richness than the comparison wetland. Which…

Two wetlands were surveyed before and after a restoration project.

| Wetland | Species before | Species after |
|---|---|---|
| Restored wetland | 18 | 27 |
| Comparison wetland | 20 | 24 |

A biologist argues that the restored wetland showed a larger increase in recorded species richness than the comparison wetland. Which choice most effectively supports the argument?

Answer and explanation

Answer: A: The restored wetland increased by 9 recorded species, whereas the comparison wetland increased by 4.

The biologist's claim is specifically about the size of the increase in each wetland, not the final species count, and A is the only choice that reports both increases and compares them: +9 versus +4. B and D each report a single data point from the table without connecting it to a change over time. C is true of both wetlands but doesn't address which one increased more.

More Command of Evidence (quantitative) questions

All Command of Evidence (quantitative) questions

Learn the method behind questions like this one

The SAT Reading & Writing course teaches each tested skill through lessons, step-by-step solutions to sample problems, the complete study guide and full-length practice tests.