SAT Reading & Writing · Command of Evidence (quantitative)

Researchers measured the time required for two groups to locate a target symbol in a visual display.

Researchers measured the time required for two groups to locate a target symbol in a visual display.

| Display type | Mean search time | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Low clutter | 2.8 s | 0.7 s |
| High clutter | 4.1 s | 0.8 s |

Which choice most effectively uses the data to support the claim that visual clutter was associated with slower search performance?

Answer and explanation

Answer: A: The high-clutter group’s mean search time was 1.3 seconds longer than the low-clutter group’s.

The claim concerns which condition produced slower performance, and A directly compares the two conditions' mean search times, the exact evidence needed. B and C each address the standard deviations, a measure of variability within each condition, not the average speed comparison the claim is about. D is a vague, non-quantitative observation that doesn't address the claim at all.

More Command of Evidence (quantitative) questions

All Command of Evidence (quantitative) questions

Learn the method behind questions like this one

The SAT Reading & Writing course teaches each tested skill through lessons, step-by-step solutions to sample problems, the complete study guide and full-length practice tests.